Kerry King announces UK and European solo tour – says Slayer will never reunite again
By SHAWN SETARO
Drake now has the next steps set for his legal battles against UMG over Kendrick Lamar‘s “Not Like Us” — one court date in December, and one in January.
According to court records viewed by HipHopDX, Drizzy’s petition that was filed in Bexar County, Texas will be heard before a judge on December 20. That hearing will be to determine whether the superstar is allowed to depose people from iHeartRadio and UMG, to ask them if they engaged in illegal activity around Kendrick’s chart-topping diss record.
Drake has another “Not Like Us”-related legal petition as well, this one in New York. For that one, a judge is set to make a decision on January 16, 2025. In that case, The Boy is asking the court to require Spotify and UMG to preserve any documents or messages relevant to their promotion of “Not Like Us.”
In the New York case, Drizzy’s legal team filed a “pre-action” petition in a Manhattan court on November 25, alleging UMG used bots, payola and other methods to inflate the chart-topping song.
“UMG did not rely on chance, or even ordinary business practices,” the docs read. “It instead launched a campaign to manipulate and saturate the streaming services and airwaves.”
The filing also alleges that the label paid Spotify to promote “Not Like Us” to users searching for unrelated songs and artists. Additionally, it claims UMG paid Apple to have Siri intentionally redirect users requesting songs from Drake’s catalog, instead offering “Not Like Us” as a result. It also claims the company used bots to burnish the song’s numbers.
The Texas case is similar, but adds iHeartRadio to the list of companies at issue. That petition brings up the specter of suing for defamation over the Kendrick Lamar diss track.
The document names iHeartRadio as possibly being the recipient of payola from Universal Music Group as part of an alleged illegal plan to get “Not Like Us” on the airwaves.
In addition, Drizzy claims that UMG released K.Dot’s now-Grammy-nominated song despite knowing that the track “falsely accus[es] him of being a sex offender.” The petition says that the Canadian superstar now has enough evidence to bring a defamation claim against the company.
Universal has strongly denied all of Drake’s claims.